Experts claim that the suspected meteors seen soaring through UK skies last night may have been bits of man-made satellites.
Great balls of fire! Night sky lights up over Britain in spectacular ‘meteor’ shower that may really have been space junk
- 20 orange objects soared through the night sky at speeds in excess of 18,000 miles an hour
- High number of eye-witness accounts suggest the sightings may have been bits of space hardware
- Meteors flash by while bits of old spacecraft appear in the sky for longer
Experts claim that the suspected meteors seen soaring through UK skies last night may have been bits of man-made satellites.
If they turn out to be right then hundreds of people will have been looking up at bits of old spacecraft burning up as they entered the atmosphere.
The large number of eyewitness accounts also support the expert’s theory as meteors – or fragments of rock – flash across the sky in an instant while incoming space hardware takes longer to pass over.
Dr Tim O’Brien, associate director of the Jordell Bank Observatory, told the BBC it was probably ‘orbital debris from satellites.
‘[The object was] probably 80 miles up or so, high up, moving very fast, actually, 18,000 miles an hour, probably, at least.’
Colin Johnston of Armagh Planetarium told the BBC a meteor shower had now been anticipated.
‘It could be a bit of natural space junk which has been floating around the universe for billions of years, or it could be a man-made satellite which has burned up,’ he said.
'atlas of the brain' Scientists can unlock our mind's secrets
Scientists create first ‘atlas of the brain’ – and release it online so researchers across the world can unlock our mind’s secrets
- Brains donated following the death of three men will serve as baseline for interactive map
- Creators share the work with the world in the hopes of collaborative research into gene structure of brain
Scientists have created a comprehensive and interactive ‘atlas of the brain’ – and have opened it up to the entire internet to help in neurological research.
The Allen Institute for Brain Science, based in Seattle, created the atlas so that other researchers can compare and contrast their own findings from brain scans and genetic surveys, with the hope that having a ‘baseline’ to work from will unveil more secrets about psychiatric conditions.
The atlas was created from the scans of three ‘clinically unremarkable’ brains – donated following the deaths of a 24-year-old and 39-year-old man, and half a brain from a third man.
There are more than 20,000 genes in the human genome, and around 84 per cent of them are active within the human brain.
To create the atlas, the scientists first of all scanned the brains, before chopping them into small pieces. For each piece, they scanned for and recorded the activity levels of the 20,000 genes.
When the scans of the two complete brains were compared to each other, the team found what they believe is a ‘genetic blueprint’ for how the brain may be mapped out – with so many similarities in gene placement and usage.
Their next aim is to scan a female brain to see how it compares to the other gender.
[Top]Do not look into the light … they are messing with your mind!
The fear factor: Researchers discovery technique to erase newly formed memories
- Researchers claim to be able to erase newly formed emotional memories
- Breakthrough could lead to new treatments for phobias and post traumatic stress
Erasing memories has long been a staple of sci-fi films, but researchers now believe they have made a breakthrough in making the process reality.
The groundbreaking research at Uppsala University in Sweden could lead to radical new treatments for sufferers of anxiety and post traumatic stress disorders.
It shows for the first time that newly formed emotional memories can be erased from the human brain.
This is shown by researchers from Uppsala University in a new study now being published by the academic journal Science.
‘These findings may be a breakthrough in research on memory and fear. Ultimately the new findings may lead to improved treatment methods for the millions of people in the world who suffer from anxiety issues like phobias, post-traumatic stress, and panic attacks,’ says Thomas Ågren, who led the study.
When a person learns something, a lasting long-term memory is created with the aid of a process of consolidation, which is based on the formation of proteins in the brain.
When we remember something, the memory becomes unstable for a while and is then restabilized by another consolidation process.
‘In other words, it can be said that we are not remembering what originally happened, but rather what we remembered the last time we thought about what happened,’ the researchers say.
By disrupting the reconsolidation process, the team found they can change what was remembered.
[Top]Did the Vatican deliberately destroy evidence to keep faith as it is today?
Ancient papyrus that ‘proves Jesus was married’ declared ‘a forgery’, ‘unconvincing’ and ‘suspicious’ by historical experts
- Ancient document attracted worldwide attention because of a phrase that says Jesus refers to Mary Magdalene as his wife
- Experts criticise its appearance and grammar, with one calling it ‘dodgy’
Historical experts have poured cold water over claims that an ancient papyrus proves Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene, describing the fragment as ‘suspicious’ and ‘a forgery’.
The antique attracted worldwide attention because of a bombshell phrase written in Egyptian Coptic that says Jesus refers to Magdalene as ‘my wife’ when speaking to his disciples.
The 8cm by 4cm fragment supports an undercurrent in Christian thought that undermines centuries of Church dogma by suggesting the Christian Messiah was not celibate.
In the text, Jesus appears to be defending her against some criticism, saying ‘she will be my disciple’. Two lines later he then tells the disciples: ‘I dwell with her.’
But historical experts at a Coptic conference in Rome today began to dismiss the papyrus.
Stephen Emmel, professor of Coptology at the University of Muenster, was on the international advisory panel that reviewed the 2006 discovery of the Gospel of Judas.
He said the text accurately quotes Jesus as saying ‘my wife’, but added: ‘There’s something about this fragment in its appearance and also in the grammar of the Coptic that strikes me as being not completely convincing somehow.’
University of Hamburg papyrologist Alin Suciu declared, simply: ‘I would say it’s a forgery. The script doesn’t look authentic.’
Wolf-Peter Funk, a Coptic linguist, said the fragment cannot be judged as it has no context and dismissed it as ‘suspicious’.
He explained: ‘There are thousands of scraps of papyrus where you find crazy things. It can be anything.’
The incomplete manuscript, written in the ancient Egyptian Coptic language, has been studied by Karen King, Hollis professor of divinity at Harvard University, the oldest endowed academic seat in the US.
[Top]The Basis of Mass Mind Control
Jon Rappoport
Infowars.com
September 18, 2012
It’s so simple. And everybody knows it.
Mass mind control focuses on two elements: image and feeling.
By linking the two primary elements, it is possible to short-circuit thought and “cut to the chase,” when it comes to enlisting the allegiance of huge populations.
Two seemingly unrelated events spurred my interest in mass mind control.
On the evening of April 12, 1945, I listened to a radio report on the death of Franklin D Roosevelt. I was seven years old.
I became upset. I didn’t know why. I was angry at my own reaction.
Forty years later, I pulled into a gas station near my apartment in West Los Angeles. I got out of my car and took the cap off my gas tank. I looked to my right and saw Tony Curtis sitting in his car. I was shocked.
A few days later, I began making notes under the heading of “image-emotion cues.” At the time, I had just started working as a reporter, writing articles for LA Weekly. I knew next to nothing about mind control, MKULTRA, Soviet psychiatric gulags, Chinese re-education programs, or US psychological warfare operations.
But because I had been painting for 25 years, I knew something about the power of images.
I remembered my first exhibition of paintings in LA, at my friend Hadidjah Lamas’ house. We had hung my work in her large living room and dining room. Hadidjah had enlisted the services of a friend who had videotaped me painting in my studio, and at the exhibition she set up a television set out on her patio and continuously played the videocassette.
People came through her front door, almost automatically walked through the house to the patio, as if guided by an unseen hand, and watched the video; then they came back inside and looked at the paintings.
They would stop at a painting and say: “That picture was in the video!” “ You see that one? It was in his studio!”
My first note on “image-emotion cues” was, “Investing an image with importance. Projecting emotion into an image.”
Projecting emotion into a newspaper image of the president, FDR. Projecting emotion into the screen image of Tony Curtis. Projecting emotion into a video of a painter working in his studio.
When people encounter an image, when they invest it with importance, they project feeling into the image—and this all happens in a private sphere, a private space.
If this didn’t happen, there would be no way to control populations through images. It wouldn’t work. It all starts with a person setting up his own personal feedback loop that travels from him to an image and back again.
Coming out of World War 2, US psychological warfare operatives knew they could turn their skills to political purposes. They had just succeeded in making Americans believe that all Japanese and German people were horribly evil. They had been able to manipulate imagery successfully in that area. Why couldn’t they shape America’s view of a whole planet that lay beyond personal experience?
They could and they did. But the power to do that emanated from the fact that every person invests images with feeling. That’s where it really starts.
I had seen the 1957 film, Sweet Smell of Success, a number of times. I admired it. Burt Lancaster and Tony Curtis gave tremendous performances. When, decades later, I saw Curtis sitting in his car at that gas station, I was “working from” the emotion I had invested in his onscreen image. It produced a sense of shock and paralysis for a few seconds.
Other people might have rushed up to Curtis and asked for his autograph. With me, it was shock, cognitive dissonance. Ditto for the death of FDR. I was working off newspaper pictures I’d seen of him, and the feeling I’d invested in those presidential images. Other people, when FDR died, went out into the street and hugged their neighbors and wept openly. For me, it was upset and shock and anger.
There’s nothing intrinsically wrong with investing emotion in images. It can be exhilarating. It can be uplifting. As a painter, I know this in spades. Putting emotion into images can, in fact, vault you into a different perception of reality.
But on the downside, it can also take you into lockstep with what media operatives want you to experience, second-hand.
[Top]OMG … we are all in shock! Jesus was married!
‘Proof’ Jesus was married found on ancient papyrus that mentions how son of God spoke of his wife and Mary Magdalene
A recently uncovered fragment of ancient papyrus makes the explosive suggestion that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were man and wife, researchers say.
The 8cm by 4cm fragment supports an undercurrent in Christian thought that undermines centuries of Church dogma by suggesting the Christian Messiah was not celibate.
The centre of the fragment contains the bombshell phrase where Jesus, speaking to his disciples, says ‘my wife’, which researchers believe refers to Magdalene.
In the text, Jesus appears to be defending her against some criticism, saying ‘she will be my disciple’. Two lines later he then tells the disciples: ‘I dwell with her.’
If genuine, the document casts doubt on a centuries old official representation of Magdalene as a repentant whore and overturns the Christian ideal of sexual abstinence.
It elaborates an ancient and persistent undercurrent in Christian thought that Jesus and Magdalene were in fact a couple, as picked up by Dan Brown in the plot of his best-selling thriller The Da Vinci Code.
The incomplete manuscript, written in the ancient Egyptian Coptic language, has been studied by Karen King, Hollis professor of divinity at Harvard University, the oldest endowed academic seat in the US.
Professor King was to present a paper on the discovery today at an international conference on Coptic studies in Rome after conducting extensive tests and research to establish the document’s authenticity.
Queen Elizabeth is Hitler’s Niece says King Edward’s daughter
King George VI
Adolph Hitler
Queen Elizabeth’s father, King George VI, was also Adolph Hitler’s half-brother (not father as initially reported) according to Emily Elizabeth Catherine Josephine Mary Windsor-Cragg, [illegitimate] daughter of Edward VIII Duke of Windsor.
“Hitler was born in 1889 five years before Edward VIII, when “Georgie” (Victoria’s favorite) was 23, long before his marriage to May Teck. He was brought up and abused as the eldest son in Bavaria, and Kaiser Wilhelm, the idealist, was in touch with him. The Duke of Windsor met his older half-brother for the first time in Germany in 1937; however, I have a document that shows Hitler was an intel agent for the British in the 1920’s, so he probably KNEW Wallis,” she says.
“Edward VIII Duke of Windsor was routed out, scapegoated, bankrupted, exiled and labeled as Not-See because his wife, unbeknownst to him on his wedding day, was an MI-5 agent of his Father, the King George V,” she says.
“Edward VIII [my dad] was never allowed to marry anybody he liked; only ditsie royal women were permitted to him. So, of course, a black intel ops woman was very attractive, if only because he was so isolated from marriageable women,” she continues.
“The whole story is held at Windsor Library in the Royal diary archives near where my father made his home before he was kicked out of England,” she adds.
Kaiser Wilhelm was exiled and Czar Nicholas was slaughtered by the Cocaine addicted bully George V because they knew the secret about Hitler’s parentage, says Lady Windsor-Cragg.
This information about Hitler contradicts the results of an Austrian Parliamentary investigation and other testimony by close Hitler aides that his father was the Baron Rothschild. Hopefully authorities in the UK will act promptly to check the Royal diary archives to confirm Lady Widnsor-Cragg’s assertions before the evidence is hidden.
A cousin of Queen Elizabeth says it is “the privilege of kings” to have “dalliances” with various women and have the resulting children sent or “remitted” to South Africa. “There is a place called George in the Outwanicque Mountains in South Africa where in the Knaizna forest you will find the Rex family, the hillbillies of South Africa,” he says. This family has some of the most royal blood in the world and are sent to “finely polished colleges,” he says.
This source also had a bombshell of his own that he would like put out on the net for confirmation or denial on the part of other informed parties: “Look at Di’s (Princess Diana’s) children. The second one’s father is Diana’s horse trainer and lover. Look at his features, they are identical to those of the horse trainer.”
Prince William King George VI_great-grandson William
Microsoft Online Privacy Statement! `Collection of Your Personal Information`
•
At some Microsoft sites, we ask you to provide personal information, such as your e-mail address, name, home or work address, or telephone number. We may also
•
In order to access some Microsoft services, you will be asked to sign in with an e-mail address and password, which we refer to as your Microsoft account. By signing in on one Microsoft site or service, you may be automatically signed into other Microsoft sites and services that use Microsoft account. For more information, see the Windows Live ID privacy supplement.
•
We collect additional information about your interaction with Microsoft sites and services without identifying you as an individual. For example, we receive certain standard information that your browser sends to every website you visit, such as your IP address, browser type and language, access times and referring Web site addresses. We also use Web site analytics tools on our sites to retrieve information from your browser, including the site you came from, the search engine(s) and the keywords you used to find our site, the pages you view within our site, your browser add-ons, and your browser’s width and height.
•
We use technologies, such as cookies and web beacons (described below), to collect information about the pages you view, the links you click and other actions you take on our sites and services.
•
We also deliver advertisements (see the Display of Advertising section below) and provide Web site analytics tools on non-Microsoft sites and services, and we collect information about page views on these third party sites as well.
•
When you receive newsletters or promotional e-mail from Microsoft, we may use web beacons (described below), customized links or similar technologies to determine whether the e-mail has been opened and which links you click in order to provide you more focused e-mail communications or other information.
In order to offer you a more consistent and personalized experience in your interactions with Microsoft, information collected through one Microsoft service may be combined with information obtained through other Microsoft services. We may also supplement the information we collect with information obtained from other companies. For example, we may use services from other companies that enable us to derive a general geographic area based on your IP address in order to customize certain services to your geographic area.
Sharing of Your Personal Information
Woman gives birth during church service of a `foal`.
A still unidentified woman from Benin (Africa) has experienced a strange event when she attended a service of a Nigerian evangelical church.
During the prayer service the woman got contractions and she gave birth to a stillborn ‘being’, which resembles a foal.
The officiating priest, Silva Wealth, and visitors to the church were shocked.
These reports The Sun.
According to S. Wealth, during the prayers it was already referred to the health problems that the woman had; “something” was blocking her uterus.
Childbirth in the church was then inevitable.
It is still unknown what the cause of the striking shape of the embryo.
The community around the church has launched an investigation into the bizarre incident.
[Top]Computer says no: Researchers believe we could communicate and debate with robots within three years
- Researchers say robots and humans could decide on plans together – or even argue the best approach
- Humans could even order robots to break rules – but the robots may argue back
Robots and computers could soon be having meaningful conversations and even arguments with humans, potentially within the next three years.
A new research project at the University of Aberdeen will develop systems that allow men to debate decisions with robots – opening up the possibility of human operators discussing action plans with robots and, if necessary, ordering them to break rules.
While Isaac Asimov fans might baulk at that last possibility – it does open up a world where intelligent technology will make life easier for humans.
For their part, the computers would be able to argue in favour of decisions or inform their operators that certain tasks are impossible.
Lead researcher Dr Wamberto Vasconcelos, from the University of Aberdeen, said the aim is to increase human trust in intelligent technology – and that early versions of the software could be available in just three years.
‘Autonomous systems such as robots are an integral part of modern industry, used to carry out tasks without continuous human guidance,’ he said.
THE THREE RULES OF ROBOTICS
If robots gain a form of intelligence, and the ability to dialogue with humans, perhaps the creators should consider implementing the Three Rules of Robotics.
Written by science-fiction writer Isaac Asimov, the rules were meant to iron-clad man’s safety from robots, but as the author’s short stories make clear, the rules are not infallible.
1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2) A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
Can you see the future???
http://nexttruth.com/?p=4561
The End Of Humanity: Rise of the Robots
http://www.infowars.com/the-end-of-humanity-rise-of-the-robots/
[Top]